Legal Opinion

Lonier v. Ann Arbor Savings Bank

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1910No. Docket No. 37PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Washtenaw; Kinne, J. Trover by Louis Lonier and William J. Hoffer, copartners as Lonier & Hoffer, against the Ann Arbor Savings Bank. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiffs on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This is an action of trover against the defendant for the unlawful conversion of a promissory note in which the plaintiffs were named as payees, which, it is claimed by them, was unlawfully indorsed by their traveling salesman and collector. The case has been here once before and is reported in 153 Mich. 253 (116 N. W. 1088). A reading of the opinion then filed will make a long statement of facts unnecessary at this time.

Upon the second trial, there was less inconsistency in the testimony of Mr. Heusel than upon the first. It is the claim of defendant that, upon this trial, there was no…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lonier v. Ann Arbor Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atlantic Trust Co. v. Subscribers to Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  2. Arcade Realty Co. v. Bank of CommerceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API