Legal Opinion

National Fence-machine Co. v. Highleyman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 8, 1905No. 14,093PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Labette district court; - Thomas J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

William R. Smith, J.:

This was an action brought by defendant in error to recover from the National Fence-machine Company the sum of $100 on its indorsement of a promissory note given to it by one Zink in September, 1902. The indorsement was made before maturity, as follows: “Protest waived. National Fence-machine Company, per H. M. Snyder, authorized agent.” The note was sold by Snyder to Highleyman. It was never in the possession of defendant below. The fence-machine company denied the authority of Snyder to bind it by his indorsement. Plaintiff had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Howe Machine Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Clark v. FolscroftSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Arcade Realty Co. v. Bank of CommerceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API