Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 27, 2001No. B144094PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
Petitioners, African-American shoppers who claim they were beaten by security guards, sued the individual guards, 2 the guards’ employer IPC International Corporation (IPC), and others, alleging various tort causes of action. Petitioners noticed the depositions of the individual guard defendants. Fearing criminal prosecution arising from the same incident, the security guards moved the trial court for a protective order precluding the depositions, or staying them until the criminal statute of limitations expires. Petitioners opposed the motion and asked the trial…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- People v. ColemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,322 Securities and Exchange Commission v. First Financial Group of Texas, Inc., William H. HowtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- A & M RECORDS, INC. v. HeilmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- AVANT! CORP. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Bains v. MooresCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Fisher v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People ex rel. City of Dana Point v. Holistic HealthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- People ex rel. Allstate Ins. Co. v. Suh, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.