Fisher v. Gibson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DOI TODD, J.
The defendant appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the plaintiff. Appellant’s primary contention is that the court should not have heard the summary judgment motion against him but should have denied or continued the motion because he faced a parallel criminal investigation and was entitled to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. We affirm because plaintiff proved his case and defendant failed to establish the right to a continuance under Code of Civil Procedure section 437c, subdivision (h).
Factual and Procedural Background
This…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Morehart v. County of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- American Continental Insurance v. C & Z Timber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Fuller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Pacers, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Monteleone v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gatton v. T-MOBILE USA, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Farmers Insurance Exchange v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Oiye v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Freeman v. Priceline.com CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Gatton v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2007