Legal Opinion

A & M RECORDS, INC. v. Heilman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1977No. Civ. 48806PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COBEY, Acting P. J.

Defendant, David L. Heilman, appeals from a judgment which: (1) incorporated the terms of an order permanently enjoining him from duplicating, advertising, shipping, or .transporting within the State of California magnetic tapes or disc phonograph records embodying any part of any recorded performance sold by A & M Records, Inc., without the consent of A & M Records, Inc., and (2) decreed an award of $136,027.82 damages and costs in favor of A & M Records, Inc. The appeal lies. (See Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (aj.)

Heilman contends that: (1) the trial court…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Carey v. Population Services InternationalSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Bigelow v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. G.S. Rasmussen & Associates, Inc. v. Kalitta Flying Service, Inc. Connie Kalitta Services, Inc. Conrad A. KalittaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. American Master Lease LLC v. Idanta Partners, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 2014

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API