Legal Opinion
State v. Johnson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 23, 2004No. A04-176PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Appellant Todd Allen Johnson challenges his conviction and sentence for criminal vehicular homicide, arguing that (1) the district court erred in denying his pretrial motion to suppress evidence and (2) the district court erred in imposing an upward durational departure at sentencing after denying appellant’s request to withdraw his guilty plea. We affirm the district court’s denial of appellant’s motion, but reverse the sentence and remand for reconsideration consistent with Blakely v. Washington, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004).
FACTS
On the evening of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Minnesota v. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Harold B. Dorman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. AliCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. CraigCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. ShrinerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
- State v. NetlandCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.