Legal Opinion

Allen v. Miller

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 18, 1955PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff might have but did not contest the payment for the plumbing work and materials on the ground of the defendant’s noncompliance with the licensing statute. (Administrative Code of City of New York, § 561-1.0; Ellejan v. Dinerstein, N. Y. L. J., May 12, 1950, p. 1701, col. 3.) Instead he paid the contract price for such work to the defendant. These circumstances do not in and of themselves entitle plaintiff to the return of such payment. (Johnston v. Dahlgren, 166 N. Y. 354, affg. 48 App. Div. 537; see, also, Low v. Capitol Wine & Spirit Corp., 272 App. Div. 703, 705.) However,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. . DahlgrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  2. Johnston v. DahlgrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Brite-N-Up, Inc. v. RenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Vegliack v. MazzellaCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  4. Schwartz v. TorrenzanoNew York Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Citaramanis v. HallowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API