Legal Opinion

Vegliack v. Mazzella

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided March 9, 1973PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCharles H. Cohen, J.

Plaintiff seeks to recover $700 from defendants for work, labor and services performed at defendants’ premises in New York City. Defendants interpose a general denial as well as a defense of illegality based upon the ground that this matter involved a home improvement contract and that plaintiff was not licensed as required by section B32350.0 et seq. of the Administrative Code of the City of New York. Defendant also is counterclaiming for breach of contract.

Plaintiff claims that he entered into an oral agreement with defendants on Sunday, May 28,1972 whereby he agreed to build a patio in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  2. Schank v. . SchuchmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. Host v. GauntlettCivil Court of the City of New York · 1973
  4. Allen v. MillerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1955
  5. De Paso v. Cooper, New York County Courts1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Anton Sattler, Inc. v. CummingsNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Thistle v. EnglertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Dartmouth Plan, Inc. v. ValleNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gargano v. SmithCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
  5. Lidogoster v. KrasnermanNew York Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API