Legal Opinion
Citaramanis v. Hallowell
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided October 14, 1992No. 120, September Term, 1991Published
1Opinion of the Court
328 Md. 142 (1992)
613 A.2d 964
TAMMY CITARAMANIS ET VIR.
v.
EUSTACE HALLOWELL ET UX.
No. 120, September Term, 1991.
Court of Appeals of Maryland.
October 14, 1992.
Mary Beth McNamara, Columbia, for petitioners/cross respondents.
Janet E. LaBella, Annapolis, as amicus curiae (Charles H. Dorsey, Jr., Stuart R. Cohen, Barbara A. Samuels, Baltimore, Mary Helen McNeal, Towson), for Legal Aid Bureau, Inc.
Daniel H. Scherr (Beth A. Jackson, Reese and Carney, all on brief), Columbia, for respondents/cross petitioners.
Alvin C. Monshower, Jr., Michael L. Jennings, Richard L. Miller, McGuire, Woods, Battle &…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Northern Securities Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Federal Communications Commission v. Woko, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Lewis & Queen v. N. M. Ball SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- John E. Rosasco Creameries, Inc. v. CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.