Legal Opinion
Mukaddam v. Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 2000No. 99 Civ. 3354(LAK)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KAPLAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Rajaa A1 Mukaddam (“Mukad-dam”) was employed by the defendant Permanent Mission of Saudi Arabia to the United Nations (the “Mission”) for over 14 years. Plaintiff contends that she was wrongfully terminated by the defendant in April 1998 following a pattern of harassment and gender discrimination that began in 1996 and asserts claims of wrongful termination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of. 1964 1 and the New York State Human Rights Law. 2
The defendant contends .that its status as the Permanent Misteion of Saudi…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Herman & MacLean v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Crosby v. National Foreign Trade CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Yuka Kato v. Shintaro Ishihara, Governor, and Tokyo Metropolitan GovernmentCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Holland v. Islamic Republic of IranDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Leutwyler v. Office of Her Majesty Queen Rania Al-AbdullahDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Figueroa v. Ministry for Foreign Affairs of SwedenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Rux v. Republic of SudanDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.