Legal Opinion
Hannett v. Jones
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided July 22, 1986No. 16353PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
Petitioner George F. Hannett brought an action in district court challenging the qualifications of the real party in interest, Bruce P. Moore, to hold the office of judge of the New Mexico Court of Appeals. Both Hannett and Moore sought the Democratic Party’s nomination as candidate for that office, and both filed declarations of candidacy for their party’s 1986 primary election. Alleging that Moore could not satisfy the residence and practice of law requirements of N.M. Const. art. VI, Sections 8 and 28, Hannett sought an order enjoining respondent Secretary of State,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Bank of the United States v. DeveauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. LynchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2003
- VanderVossen v. City of EspanolaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Morris v. BrandenburgNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- Block v. Vigil-GironNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.