Legal Opinion
VanderVossen v. City of Espanola
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided April 12, 2001No. 20,620PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BOSSON, Judge.
{1} Three years after Robert Seeds obtained a special exception from the Española Board of Adjustments (the Board) to operate an automobile storage yard in a residential zone, his neighbors, Anthony and Kathy VanderVossen, challenged the validity of that special exception before the Española City Council. When the City Council confirmed the special exception, the VanderVossens appealed to district court, which reversed the City Council and ordered a rehearing before the Board. Under NMSA 1978, § 39-3-1.1(E) (1999), Seeds applied to the Court of Appeals for a writ of…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Fernandez v. Farmers Ins. Co. of ArizonaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- Flaska v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
- High Ridge Hinkle Joint Venture v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
- Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Seeds v. LuceroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- C.F.T. Development, LLC v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Wakeland v. New Mexico Dep't of Workforce SolutionsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- State v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016
- El Castillo Ret. Residences v. MartinezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2017
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.