Legal Opinion

New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. Johnson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1998No. 23,239PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MINZNER, J.

{1} This case concerns the authority of the Secretary of the New Mexico Human Services Department to restrict funding for medically necessary abortions under the State’s Medicaid program. The Secretary appeals the district court’s order permanently enjoining the Department from enforcing a rule that prohibits the use of state funds to 'pay for abortions for Medicaid-eligible women except when necessary to save the life of the mother, to end an ectopic pregnancy, or when the pregnancy resulted from rape or incest. Under the district court’s order, the Department must allow…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Payne v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. New Mexico Right to Choose/NARAL v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Bell v. Low Income Women of TexasTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State, Department of Health & Social Services v. Planned Parenthood of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. American Civil Liberties Union v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API