Legal Opinion

Chiles v. Kail

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1949No. 30820PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchwellenbach, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action against defendant for the sum of $12,314.84, given by him to her between April, 1940, and March, 1945, in reliance upon her promise to marry him, alleging that the money was obtained by fraud and trickery. The defense was that the action was barred by the statute of limitations.

At the time of the trial, plaintiff was a bachelor, sixty-two years of age. He is assistant engineer at the Seattle Public Library and the National Biscuit Company. In May, 1940, he was walking down Fourth avenue in Seattle, when he was accosted by defendant. She smiled at him and called…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beyerle v. BartschWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Tisdale v. TisdaleWashington Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Beckendorf v. BeckendorfWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Howell v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  4. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Standard Lumber & Manufacturing Company, a Corporation v. Jess Johnstun, Leola Johnstun, Theron Johnstun and Maxine M. JohnstunCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API