Legal Opinion

Beyerle v. Bartsch

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1920No. 15613PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Ronald, J., entered June 2, 1919, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action to establish a claim against the estate of a decedent, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.

The appellant sues the respondent, in his official capacity as administrator with the will annexed of the estate of Frederick Stolley, deceased, for the value of services she rendered Stolley during his lifetime. On May 11, 1917, Stolley’s will was admitted to probate, and on May 22, respondent was appointed administrator with the wall annexed, and qualified on November 15, 1917; on the same day, an order *288was made for publishing notices to creditors, and on April 16, 1918, .the appellant presented her claim, which was rejected, of which she was notified on July 22, 1918, and thereafter, on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sloan v. WestWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Stans v. BaiteyWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Engstrom v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Creasman v. BoyleWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Poole v. SchrichteWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Kelley v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Barker v. BarkerWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In Re Englund's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API