Legal Opinion

Tisdale v. Tisdale

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1922No. 16761PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Snohomish county, Bell, J., entered May 10, 1921, upon findings in favor of the defendant, dismissing an action to annul a marriage, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBridges, J.

By this action the plaintiff sought to annul the marriage between herself and the defendant. There is no dispute as to the facts, which were as follows: The marriage took place in the city of Seattle, on January 24, 1921. In some manner not explained, a marriage license was obtained. At the time *139of the marriage, the plaintiff was seventeen years of age, and the defendant more than twenty-one. Neither of the parents of the plaintiff gave their consent in writing, or otherwise, to the marriage; on the contrary, such marriage was had against their wishes and consent. After the marriage, and up…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re HollopeterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Cushman v. CushmanWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of SandyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  2. Chiles v. KailWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Harding v. HardingWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Lowman & Hanford Co. v. ErvinWashington Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API