Legal Opinion

Quandt v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1902No. 4228PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, King County. — Hon. Arthur E. Greetin', Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Tlie opinion of the court was delivered by

White, J.

— This action was instituted by the respondents to obtain restitution of the premises described in the complaint, and damages for the unlawful detention thereof. The proceedings are under an act entitled “An act defining forcible entry, forcible detainer, and unlawful detainer of real property, and providing remedies therefor by summary proceedings.” Laws 1891, p 179; Bal. Code, §§ 5525-5552, inclusive. The second paragraph of the complaint is as follows:

“That heretofore, towit: on or about August 6, 1901, said plaintiffs leased to' said…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Harris v. HalversonWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. CaseyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. O'Connell v. AraiWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Quandt v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Quandt v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API