Legal Opinion
First National Bank v. White-Dulany Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1922No. 17267PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.
The gist of respondents’ cause of action, as alleged in their complaint, is that:
“Plaintiffs are a hanking corporation under the national hanking laws of the United States; that, in the year 1921, a mortgage was executed by V. B. Bennington to plaintiffs, covering all of the .crops of wheat grown on the farm of the mortgagor in Adams county, Washington, during the season of 1921; that the mortgage was filed for record in the office of the auditor of Adams county, Washington, in due time, and was a lien upon the grain described therein; that, in the year 1921, there were grown 5,638 bushels of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ticknor v. McClellandIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Rothweiler v. Winton Motor Car Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- German-American State Bank v. Seattle Grain Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- Bollen v. Wilson Creek Union Grain & Trading Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
- O'Connell v. AraiWashington Supreme Court · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Loudon v. CooperWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Cashmere Valley Bank v. Pacific Fruit & Produce Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
- Smith's Transfer & Storage Co. v. Reliable Stores Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
- Goddard v. MorganWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Bank of California v. American Fruit Growers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Washington · 1941