Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Hollingsworth Ex Rel. Hollingsworth v. Burns

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 29, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partConnor, J.

Action for damages for personal injury resulting from being struck by the automobile truck of defendant, while plaintiff, a boy of twelve years of age, was playing with some other children on or near a street in the city of Charlotte. It appears that defendant's truck was being driven by his employee on this occasion at a high rate of speed on the left side of the street, at a place where children were playing.

Issues of negligence, contributory negligence, and damages were submitted to the jury, resulting in a verdict thereon in favor of the plaintiff. From judgment on the verdict defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rolin v. . Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Tart Ex Rel. Tart v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
  3. Fry v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Hoggard v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  5. Ghorley v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams Ex Rel. Adams v. State Board of EducationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  2. Hutchens Ex Rel. Hutchens v. SouthardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Carter v. SheltonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API