Hoggard v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.
Tbe only, question presented on tbe record was whether tbe court below, under tbe facts, ought to have nonsuited tbe plaintiff. We think not.
In building the bridge tbe banisters were constructed with a plank 10 inches wide at tbe bottom on tbe floor of tbe bridge, then a space of 23 inches, and another 10-inch plank at tbe top, making a banister between 3% and 4 feet high, with an open space between tbe top and bottom railings 23 inches wide. This open space extended from end to end of tbe bridge on both sides, being broken only by tbe posts, which were spaced 8 feet apart. Tbe bridge was at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Power v. HarlowMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Fry v. Southern Public Utilities Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
- Starling v. Selma Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Morris, Adm'r. v. Langley MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
- Starling v. Selma Cotton MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caudle v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1932
- Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Reaves v. Catawba Manufacturing & Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Boykin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Hollingsworth Ex Rel. Hollingsworth v. BurnsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.