Legal Opinion

INDUCTION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. Justus

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided March 18, 2008No. E2007-01135-COA-R3-CVPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · LeeSharon G. Lee, J.

in which CHARLES D. SUSANO, JR., J., and NORMA McGEE OGLE, Sp. J., joined.

The judgment creditor obtained an order of execution on certain items of personal property in the possession of the judgment debtor. After the sheriffs department seized the property, several parties filed a motion to intervene, alleging that some of the assets seized were owned by them and not the judgment debtor. Following a trial, the trial court ruled in the intervenors’ favor, finding that they had demonstrated ownership of the property at issue. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

I. Background

On…

3Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Lawrence Ex Rel. Powell v. StanfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Presley v. BennettTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In Re the Adoption of E.N.R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Seals v. England/Corsair Upholstery Manufacturing Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beacon4, LLC v. I & L Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
  2. Dennis David Schuelke v. Brad GudgeonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2014
  3. In Re Estate of Adam Randall WilsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024
  4. Jack Pirtle, in his capacity as the of the Estate of Mark A. Pirtle v. John R. HowertonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2026
  5. Mark Steven Meadows v. Sharon Kay StoryCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API