Legal Opinion

Seybold v. Rehwald

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1911No. 21,664PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Prom Cass Circuit Court; James P. Wason, Special Judge. Petition by John C. Rehwald and another to establish a drain. Frederick Seybold and others remonstrated. From a judgment for petitioners, the remonstrants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtCox, J.

On September 7,1908, appellees, Mary J. Brophy and John C. Rehwald, filed a petition in the Cass Circuit Court to establish a drain, alleging therein, together with other things necessary to be averred, that they were, respectively, the owners of certain tracts of land, therein described, which would be benefited by the drain; and also alleging that the lands of others therein described, would be affected by the proposed drainage, and among these were certain lands of appellants.

After due notice, and an appearance by appellants in response thereto, the proceeding was docketed as a cause, and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parkison v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Osborn v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Glendenning v. StahleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Carr v. DuhmeIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Keiser v. MillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Vermillion v. First National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. State Exchange Bank v. PaulIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Hitt v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Thompson v. FergusonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Jones v. LuddingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API