Keiser v. Mills
Indiana Supreme Court
Erom Hamilton Circrtit Court; 11. K. Kane, Special Judge. Proceeding by Erank H. Keiser and others for the construction of a ditch. William A. Mills and others remonstrated. Erom a judgment in favor of remonstrants, certain petitioners appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.
A petition was filed by appellants and others on' January 24, 1901, in the clerk’s office of the court below, for the construction of a ditch under the drainage law of 1885 and the amendments thereto (§§5622-5631, 5644-5646 Burns 1894). Notice was given to the owners and occupants of the several tracts of land described in the petition in the manner prescribed by law> and the case was docketed. No remonstrance having been filed, the same was referred to the drainage commissioners as required by §5624, supra. Said commissioners afterwards made their report to the court, from which it appeared…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lowe v. TurpieIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Goodrich v. StanglandIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Armstrong v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Poundstone v. BaldwinIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Roach v. BakerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thorn v. SilverIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Hall v. KincaidIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Smith v. GustinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Town of Windfall City v. State ex rel. WoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1910
- Pitser v. McCreeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.