Legal Opinion

Glendenning v. Stahley

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1910No. 21,596PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Prom Wells Circuit Court; Charles E. Sturgis, Judge. Highway petition by Edward Stahley and others, against which Joseph Glendenning and others remonstrate. Prom a judgment for petitioners, remonstrators appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a proceeding to locate, lay out and establish a public highway, instituted by appellees before the Board of Commissioners of the County of Adams. Appellants filed a joint remonstrance, on the ground that the proposed highway would not be of public utility, and separate remonstrances claiming damages. Reviewers were appointed, who reported in favor of the public utility of the proposed road, and awarded damages to each of the appellants. The board thereupon made and entered the following order: “And therefore, after due consideration, the board is of the opinion, and therefore finds…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Green v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Parker County v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
  3. Pittsburgh, Bradford & Buffalo Railway Co. v. McCloskeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  4. Richland School Township v. OvermyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Fifer v. RitterIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Honolulu Plantation Co. Honolulu Plantation Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Amory v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. State v. Church of Nazarene of LogansportIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. State v. Heslar, Extrx.Indiana Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Andrews v. City of GreenbeltCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API