Legal Opinion
Department of Labor v. Goldstein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 6, 1992No. MDL No. 902; No. 91-CIV-4031 (LJF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FREEH, District Judge.
Plaintiff Department of Labor (“DOL”) has moved the Court to stay all state and federal court litigation pending against defendant Consolidated Welfare Fund (the “Fund”). The Court has received no objections to the entry of such a stay. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, the DOL’s motion is granted, and all cases against the Fund are stayed until further notice.
FACTS
The DOL instituted this action in June 1991, against the Fund, past and current Fund trustees, Consolidated Local Union # 867, and certain insurance agencies, which the DOL claims are…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re Consolidated Welfare Fund ERISA LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992