Legal Opinion

In Re Consolidated Welfare Fund ERISA Litigation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 6, 1992No. MDL No. 902. No. 91-CIV-4031 (LJF)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

798 F.Supp. 125 (1992)

In re CONSOLIDATED WELFARE FUND "ERISA" LITIGATION.

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Plaintiff,

v.

GOLDSTEIN, et al., Defendants.

MDL No. 902. No. 91-CIV-4031 (LJF).

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 6, 1992.

Tess J. Ferrara, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Office of the Sol., Plan Benefits Div., Washington, D.C., for plaintiff.

A. Michael Weber, Carter K. Combe, Roberts & Finger, New York City, consenting defendants.

Broderick, Broderick & Redmond, Bayside, N.Y., for William Loeb.

Arnold Pedowitz, New York City, for Benefit Concepts, Inc.

Robert Benneman, Dublirer, Haydon, Straci &…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. New York Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. Donovan v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Lankenau v. Coggeshall & HicksCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perez v. Bridgeport Health Care Center, IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API