Donovan v. City of Dallas
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Black
The question presented here is whether a state court can validly enjoin a person from prosecuting an action in personam in a district or appellate court of the United States which has jurisdiction both of the parties and of the subject matter.
The City of Dallas, Texas, owns Love Field, a municipal airport. In 1961, 46 Dallas citizens who owned or had interests in property near the airport filed a class suit in a Texas court to restrain the city from building an additional runway and from issuing and selling mu*541nicipal bonds for that purpose. The complaint alleged many damages that would occur…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Princess Lida of Thurn and Taxis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Peck v. JennessSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
- Riggs v. Johnson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. KepnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by357 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- In Re Robert Gruntz, Debtor. Robert Gruntz v. Opinion County of Los Angeles Los Angeles District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
352 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.