Legal Opinion
D'Amico v. Crosson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 8, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Green, J. P.
This case presents the latest in a long series of equal protection challenges to the geographical distinctions in judicial salaries created by the Unified Court Budget Act (Judiciary Law § 39 [6]) and set forth in article 7-B of the Judiciary Law (see, Cass v State of New York, 58 NY2d 460, rearg denied 60 NY2d 586; Weissman v Evans, 56 NY2d 458; Henry v Milonas, 229 AD2d 921; Dickinson v Crosson, 219 AD2d 50; Killeen v Crosson, 218 AD2d 217; Wilson v Crosson, 222 AD2d 1085; Nicolai v Crosson, 214 AD2d 714, appeal dismissed 87 NY2d 896, 88 NY2d 867; Burke v…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Burke v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Weissman v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Cass v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Davis v. RosenblattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Barr v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 2000
- Barr v. CrossonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997