Legal Opinion

Mahan v. Clee

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error-to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Negligence case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

McGrath,-J.

Defendant owns and operates a flouring mill in the city of Detroit. Plaintiff, who is 50 years of age, had been in defendant’s employ for nearly 8 years. Plaintiff claims to haVe been employed to cooper barrels, fill them, and weigh them, and, when not thus engaged, wait on customers. Occasionally he was asked to deliver flour, but he claims to have objected to that kind of .work, because not employed therefor. He had, however, during the time that he was in defendant’s employ, delivered quite a number of loads of flour, and stated that he objected at least 40 times.

He sets up that…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weiden v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API