Bell v. Mulkey

BAUD; C. J.

This is the second appeal of this case, the former judgment having been reversed by this court in an opinion by Judge Boyce, found in 248 S. W. 785. A writ of error from that decision was dismissed by the Supreme Court for want of jurisdiction. The case was again tried at the October term of the district court of Hardeman county, again resulting in a judgment for the appellee.

It appears that the case was tried the last time upon ' the same pleadings as before. Judge Boyce has made such a clear and succinct statement of the nature and result of the suit in the opinion above referred…