Legal Opinion

Toy v. Katz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 8, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 95-0409, 1 CA-CV 96-0232PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRANT, Judge.

■ Appellants Louis and Alice Toy (“Toys”) appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellees A. Alexander Katz, Esq. (“Katz”) and Harriet Katz, his wife in a legal malpractice action. Katz represented the Toys in the sale of the retail division of their corporation. The trial court ruled the Toys were precluded from suing Katz because his professional negligence damaged only their corporation. The trial court also ruled that, while the corporation was a real party in interest, the Toys’ attempt to name the corporation as a plaintiff did not…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Donnelly Const. Co. v. Oberg/Hunt/GillelandArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Whelan v. AbellCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
  4. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Phillips v. ClancyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Fujimoto v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Englert v. Carondelet Health NetworkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Estate of Nelson v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  4. Nett v. BellucciMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  5. CDT, Inc. v. Addison, Roberts & Ludwig, C.P.A., P.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API