Legal Opinion

CDT, Inc. v. Addison, Roberts & Ludwig, C.P.A., P.C.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 24, 2000No. 2 CA-CV 99-0048PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Judge.

¶ 1 In this accounting malpractice action, appellant CDT, Inc., challenges the trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees Addison, Roberts & Ludwig, P.C., and several of its individual shareholders (collectively, ARL) on statute of limitations grounds. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

¶ 2 Although most of the pertinent facts are essentially undisputed, we view the evidence and all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was entered. Doe v. Roe, 191 Ariz. 313, ¶ 14, 955 P.2d 951, ¶ 14 (1998); Logerquist v.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Atkins v. CroslandTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Ackerman v. Price WaterhouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Jordache Enterprises Inc. v. BrobeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Doe v. RoeArizona Supreme Court · 1998

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Khan v. BDO Seidman, LLPAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  2. Sahadi v. ScheafferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Corbett v. Manorcare of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Manterola v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  5. Smith Ex Rel. Boston v. Arthur Andersen LLPDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API