Legal Opinion
Karuk Tribe of California v. United States Forest Service
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 1, 2005No. C 04-4275 SBAPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 54], Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs Declaration of Toz Soto [Docket No. 59], and the Miners’ Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Concerning the Record [Docket No. 65]. Having read and considered the arguments presented by the parties in the papers submitted to the Court, the Court finds this matter appropriate for resolution without a hearing. The Court hereby GRANTS Defendants’ Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiffs Declaration of Toz Soto, GRANTS IN PART…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Siskiyou Regional Education Project v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. KempthorneDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2007
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Center for Biological Diversity v. SalazarDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.