Commonwealth v. Wilson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
BECK, Judge:
These are appeals from judgments of sentence. They are separate cases but involve the same legal issues and almost identical facts. Therefore, they have been consolidated pursuant to Pa.R.A.P. 513. The appellants were charged initially with criminal solicitation under 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 902. In each case, the prosecution was permitted to amend the informations to charge a count of prostitution pursuant to 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 5902. 1 All four appellants were found guilty in separate non-jury trials of both counts. Each was fined $100.00 and given a six month suspended sentence.
Appellants…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. DankoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Moncrief v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. GenteelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- State v. AraveUtah Supreme Court · 2011
- Commonwealth v. CautoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- State v. SadowskiNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Wilson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.