Moncrief v. City of Detroit
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.
The parties propose two dispositive issues: 1
1. Did the trial court err in refusing to consider the police officer’s testimony regarding the contents of the police report on the issue of negligence?
2. Did the trial judge err in ruling that the facts did not support a finding of negligence on behalf of the bus driver?
We find that the judge did not err in either instance and therefore affirm the Court of Appeals.
I — Facts
The appeal revolves around the testimony of three persons — plaintiff, the bus driver arid a police officer.
Plaintiff testified that on January 7, 1968 she was a passenger on a…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Mitcham v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Johnson v. LutzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Gadde v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. RodgersMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- People v. FackelmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2011
- Solomon v. ShuellMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
- Genna v. JacksonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- Commonwealth v. LambSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- People v. KubasiakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.