Commonwealth v. King
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Cbrconb, J.,
This case is before us on defendant’s appeal from the lower court’s refusal to grant a new trial after he was found guilty by a jury on the charge of selling LSD tablets in violation of The Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, September 26, 1961, P. L. 1664, Section 4, subsection (d), 35 P.S. §780-4.
The new trial motion is predicated on two contentions (a) the court erred in failing to grant a motion for continuance, and (b) the District Attorney committed x>rejudicial error in his comments to the jury.1 At the preliminary hearing there was some question as to whether the sale…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ScoleriSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Commonwealth v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
- Commonwealth v. CisnerosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Commonwealth v. SyrenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Commonwealth v. MikaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Commonwealth v. PerkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Commonwealth v. StanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Fretts v. PavettiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. CasuccioSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. GuessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.