Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Cauto

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1987No. 03121PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HESTER, Judge:

Following a jury trial, appellant Robert Cauto was convicted of six sex offenses against three juvenile males, all of whom were under the age of sixteen at the time of the incidents. In this appeal from judgment of sentence, appellant challenges the trial court’s refusal to allow him to cross-examine two of the complainants for bias based on their juvenile records, the court’s interpretation of the criminal solicitation statute, trial counsel’s effectiveness, and other trial rulings. We agree that the prohibition against cross-examination with respect to the juvenile records of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Washington v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  5. Commonwealth v. CortezSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MarisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Commonwealth v. BuksaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. VanderlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. MarconiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. State v. AraveUtah Supreme Court · 2011

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API