Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Campbell v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided August 11, 1992No. Record No. 1048-90-1Published

1ConcurrenceBarrow, J.

Although I concur with the majority opinion, I write separately to explain why, in my opinion, the contemporaneous objection rule does not bar a reversal in this appeal. By writing separately, I seek to express those principles that underlie my decision and urge the uniform application of these principles to like cases.

The contemporaneous objection rule embodied in Rule 5A:18 is not without exception. Even where an objection is not stated, an error may be the basis for reversal (1) “for good cause shown,” or (2) “to enable the Court of Appeals to attain the ends of justice.” Rule 5A:18. In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lavinder v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  2. Brown v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1989
  3. Mounce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987
  4. Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  5. Townes v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API