Lavinder v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARROW, J.
A rehearing en banc was granted in this appeal to consider what test applies in measuring whether a non-constitutional error is harmless. We conclude that, if it plainly appears from the facts and circumstances of a particular case that a non-constitutional error did not affect the verdict, the error is harmless.
In Virginia, non-constitutional error is harmless “[w]hen it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached.” Code § 8.01-678 (emphasis added). “[A] fair…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- LeVasseur v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by231 opinions
- Pugliese v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
- State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Hooker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
- Ragland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.