Legal Opinion

Lavinder v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided July 30, 1991No. Record No. 0303-89-3PublishedCited by 231 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARROW, J.

A rehearing en banc was granted in this appeal to consider what test applies in measuring whether a non-constitutional error is harmless. We conclude that, if it plainly appears from the facts and circumstances of a particular case that a non-constitutional error did not affect the verdict, the error is harmless.

In Virginia, non-constitutional error is harmless “[w]hen it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached.” Code § 8.01-678 (emphasis added). “[A] fair…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Mu'Min v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Commonwealth v. StorySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. LeVasseur v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by231 opinions

  1. Pugliese v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993
  2. State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hooker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  4. Harris v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1998
  5. Ragland v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1993

226 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API