Legal Opinion

Brown v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided May 2, 1989No. Record No. 0957-87-4PublishedCited by 145 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

This appeal addresses the limitation upon the Court of Appeals to consider a trial court error for which no contemporaneous objection was made. The alleged error occurred in sentencing. Rule 5A:18 directs that no ruling of a trial court will be considered as a basis for reversal unless, the objection and grounds were stated at the time, except for good cause shown or to enable the court to attain the ends of justice. The appellant does not contend that good cause existed for failing timely to object to the alleged error. In fact, he contends his trial counsel was ineffective…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Yarborough v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  4. Tafero v. DuggerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Mounce v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by145 opinions

  1. Redman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1997
  2. Jimenez v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  3. Neal v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  4. Hall v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992

140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API