Legal Opinion
In Re Grand Jury Proceedings Witness Agosto
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided January 4, 1983No. CV-LV-82-9, HECPublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
CLAIBORNE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Quash Grand Jury Subpoena ad Testificandum or, in the alternative, for a Protective Order. Charles Agosto, Movant, requests that the subpoena ad testificandum, issued by the Special Grand Jury impaneled May 18, 1982, be quashed or alternatively, that the Court prohibit, by protective order, the Movant being interrogated by the members of the Grand Jury or any representative of the Department of Justice as to any matter, which testimony might be included in evidence presented to the Special Grand Jury for use in any…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- United States v. Douglas Lee Dunford, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Mohammed IsmailCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
- People v. SandersIllinois Supreme Court · 1983
- United States v. Patricia Davies and Martin KaprelianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- In Re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.