Legal Opinion
Crowder v. Continental Materials Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 30, 1979No. 51206PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLIN, Justice:
Appellant, hereafter plaintiff, brought an action seeking damages for personal injuries, allegedly sustained by reason of defendants’ negligent acts of commission and omission. Defendants denied allegations of negligence and pleaded contributory negligence. Defendants moved for summary judgment for lack of trial court jurisdiction, claiming plaintiff’s rights were reserved to State Industrial Court under Workmen’s Compensation Act, 85 O.S.1971 § 1, et seq. (the Act). After consideration of pleadings and briefs the trial court sustained defendants’ motion and granted summary…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ohio Drilling Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
- Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948
- Wilson Co., Inc. v. MusgraveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Updike Advertising System, Inc. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Carroll v. District Court of the Fifteenth Judicial District CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- FARLEY v. CITY OF CLAREMORESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
- Lambert v. Inryco, Inc.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1982
- O'BAUGH v. Drilling Well Control, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- Bowman v. Sportsworld DevelopmentCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
- Opinion No. (1998), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1998