Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Sportsworld Development
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 1, 1992No. 78915PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ADAMS, Judge:
Claimant William Lincoln Bowman was injured in an automobile accident which occurred while Bowman was engaged in the business of Sportsworld Development, Inc. According to the uncontroverted evidence, at the time of Bowman’s injury, Sportsworld had workers’ compensation insurance through the Oklahoma Retail Merchants Group Self Insurance Association (Insurer). In addition, Bowman conceded he owned more than ten per cent of Sports-world’s stock. Finding Bowman was excluded from workers’ compensation coverage by 85 O.S.1991 § 3(4), the trial court denied his claim.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Updike Advertising System, Inc. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Mid-Continent Casualty Company v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Crowder v. Continental Materials Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
3Cited by3 opinions
- Randy Trainor v. Apollo Metal Specialties, Inc. And Danny PilgrimCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003
- Opinion No. (1998), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1998
- Trainor v. Apollo MetalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002