Legal Opinion

Mahon v. City of Bethlehem

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 17, 1995No. 2:94-cv-05078PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Defendants City of Bethlehem and Police Officers Joseph Gross, Crenko and Ladies and Sergeants Frances Donchez and Bernie Benko (Moving Defendants) ask this Court to reconsider our August 28,1995 Memorandum and Order granting Bethlehem Musikfest Association’s Summary Judgment Motion on Moving Defendants’ cross-claim against Mu-sikfest. This Court will reconsider a decision if it is necessary to “correct manifest errors of law or fact or to present newly discovered evidence.” Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F.2d 906, 909 (3d Cir.1985). A motion to reconsider is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Harsco Corp. v. Lucjan ZlotnickiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
  3. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Ersek v. Springfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. American Society for Testing & Materials v. Corrpro Companies, Inc., Michael Baach Warren Rogers Warren Rogers & Associates, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  2. El v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Amer Society Testing v. Corrpro Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
  4. Cary v. Gooding, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API