Custom Products, Inc. v. Fluor Daniel Canada, Inc.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HEYBURN, Chief Judge.

The Court now considers two separate motions, one filed by Custom Products, Inc. (“Custom Products”) and GenTee Equipment Company, Inc. (“GenTee”), and the other by Commercial Alcohols, Inc. (“CAI”). Both motions require the Court to determine whether Canadian law or Kentucky law should govern Defendants CAI and Fluor Daniel Canada, Inc.’s (“Fluor Daniel”) tort claims. This Court has carefully considered both motions bearing in mind the principle that “choice of law primarily concerns the state’s interests in the litigation.” Rutherford v. Goodyear Tire…