Legal Opinion

Ohio Casualty Insurance v. Vermeer Manufacturing Co.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided January 12, 2004No. Civil Action 3:02CV-721-HPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HEYBURN, Chief Judge.

This is a subrogation action premised upon products liability in which the only damages are to the product itself. Defendant, Vermeer Manufacturing Company, (“Vermeer”) has moved for summary judgment against the Plaintiff, Ohio Casualty Company, on the grounds that the economic loss rule and the absence of priority bar all claims. The economic loss rule does bar most of Plaintiffs claims. However, for the time being, Plaintiff retains its breach of warranty claim.

I

The facts of this case are straightforward. Vermeer manufacturers and supplies heavy…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Mt. Lebanon Personal Care Home, Inc. v. Hoover Universal, Inc. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
  3. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  4. Williams v. FulmerKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Real Estate Marketing, Inc. v. FranzKentucky Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005
  2. National Surety Corp. v. Hartford Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Continental Field Systems, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2005
  4. General Cable Corp. v. HighlanderDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2006
  5. Brewer Machine & Conveyor Mfg. Co. v. Old National BankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API