Legal Opinion

Green v. Clarendon County School District Three

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided April 30, 1996No. Civ. A. 2:94-4-18AJPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NORTON, District Judge.

Words are like leaves; and where they most abound, much fruit of sense beneath is rarely found.

—ALEXANDER POPE, An ESSAY On CRITICISM.

This action is before the court on the parties’ verbose and extensive cross-motions for summary judgment. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the court denies Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment, and the court grants in part and denies in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

This case arises out of an allegation of racial discrimination in employment. Plaintiff was first employed by the Defendant Clarendon…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. White v. CMA Const. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  2. Kirchmann v. Lake Elsinore Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  3. Williams v. Grimes Aerospace Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1997
  4. Martin v. CLEMSON UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2009
  5. Smith v. School District of Greenville CountyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API