Legal Opinion
Samuel W. Hurowitz, Inc. v. Selkin
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 18, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The complaint contains two causes of action by each of sixteen plaintiffs. Only sixteen of these causes of action, however, affect the defendant Golding, whose motion to dismiss the complaint as insufficient was denied, and these may be regarded as identical for the purposes of this appeal.
The plaintiffs are contractors who have performed work in the construction of the Bronx Hospital. Each plaintiff alleges in the complaint that the Bronx Hospital Association is an unincorporated association of more than seven members and that the individual, defendants are members thereof; that before the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pollitz v. . Wabash R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Rochester Railway Co. v. RobinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Titus v. . PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Winter v. . American Aniline Products, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- California Packing Corp. v. Kelly Storage & Distributing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stern Bros. v. New York Edison Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Abrams v. Roseth Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Weiss v. GoldslegerNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- United States v. Certain Lands in City of JamestownDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1940