Abrams v. Roseth Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtUntermyer, J.
The complaint, which has been held to be insufficient in law as against the defendants Frost and Stone, sets forth two causes of action. The first is directed only against the Roseth Corporation, Goldman and Friedman upon an agreement made in 1922 whereby the plaintiff was employed on a commission basis to procure acceptable firms or corporations in England to or through which the products of the corporation would be sold or distributed. It is alleged that the plaintiff procured an English firm, acceptable to said defendants as a purchaser or agency of the products of the corporation and that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. . BarberNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Spotten v. De FreestAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
- Samuel W. Hurowitz, Inc. v. SelkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
3Cited by3 opinions
- Bayne v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
- Faulk v. MiltonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Cascina Ca De Lupis, S.R.L. v. BoninoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010