Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Goldsleger

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohh L. Fiyhh, J.

Defendant moves to dismiss the complaint on the ground it fails to state a cause of action and to vacate the warrant of attachment.

Plaintiff sues to recover a deposit after electing to rescind a contract which plaintiff was induced to enter through the fraud of defendant. A warrant of attachment was issued in that action.

Defendant contends that the complaint is insufficient (1) because it fails to specify the respects in which the representations were false, and (2) the complaint does not allege that the statements were made with the intent to defraud and deceive plaintiff. These objections…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bard-Parker Co. v. Dictograph Products Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  2. Bloom v. Wrought Iron Novelty Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1926
  3. Samuel W. Hurowitz, Inc. v. SelkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freedman v. Wilson Securities Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. Weiss v. GoldslegerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API